Let's start with the numbers, because they matter.
"Women are adopting generative AI at a 25% lower rate than men on average — despite the fact that the benefits would apply equally to both."
Harvard Business School, 2025 — meta-analysis of 18 studies involving 140,000+ workersAnd the stakes of that gap are stark. The jobs women hold are three times more likely to be automated by AI. Yet women are the ones least likely to be upskilling to stay ahead of it.
"63% of women report a lack of AI skills and access to training on the job."
Women in Tech Network, 2025This is not a story about women being less capable, less curious or less interested in technology. The women I know are brilliant, adaptable and more than capable of learning anything they put their minds to.
This is a story about access. About who gets invited into the conversation. About who the resources, the spaces and the language of AI were built for.
Why the Gap Exists
There are a few things happening at once that compound the problem.
The resources weren't built for us
Most AI learning content is written by and for software engineers, data scientists and tech founders. The examples use coding metaphors. The vocabulary assumes a technical background. Even the communities where AI is discussed are dominated by the same voices.
Women who are curious about AI — but don't identify as technical — hit this wall early and often conclude that AI is "not for them." It is. The resources just weren't designed with them in mind.
The encouragement gap is real
The jobs women hold are three times more likely to be automated by AI — yet women are using AI at a 25% lower rate than men. Fortune magazine called this "a paradox that could create a two-tiered AI economy." When women aren't encouraged to experiment with AI tools at work, and aren't represented in the rooms where AI strategy is being formed, the gap compounds.
The roles most at risk are disproportionately held by women
Research consistently shows that roles involving repetitive tasks, data entry, coordination and administration are most likely to be disrupted by AI automation. These roles are also disproportionately held by women — particularly women in lower-income brackets and women who have taken career breaks for caregiving.
The women who most need to understand AI are often the least likely to have been given the tools or encouragement to do so.
What Closing the Gap Actually Looks Like
This is not a problem that will solve itself. But it's also not as complicated to address as it might seem.
Start where you are
You do not need to understand how a large language model works to use one effectively. You do not need a computer science degree to build an AI workflow that saves you hours every week. The barrier to entry is lower than the AI industry would have you believe.
The most important thing you can do is start. Pick one task you do repeatedly and try using ChatGPT or another AI tool for it this week. That's it. One task.
Find your community
Learning is faster and more sustainable when you do it alongside people navigating the same questions. Find spaces where women are sharing what is actually working in their real jobs — not abstract AI theory, but practical applications in marketing, HR, finance, ops and beyond.
Claim your seat at the table
AI literacy is becoming a professional essential at the same speed that digital literacy did twenty years ago. The women who develop it now will have a genuine advantage in how their careers develop over the next decade.
This is not about becoming a tech expert. It is about being the person in the room who understands what AI can and cannot do — and who knows how to use it to do better work.
You belong in this conversation.
She Thinks AI is a warm community for women growing with AI at work — free resources, fortnightly newsletter and events designed for exactly where you are right now.
Join free →